Panel Discussion at CPT this weekend

Is theatre the best medicine?
What's behind the boom in medical theatre - and where's it leading? In what ways is medicine benefiting from theatre’s interest in it? What do the two worlds have to offer one another? What do practitioners from either discipline learn from stepping into the other? Is this development driven mainly by funding - and if so, is that a bad thing?
Tom Ziessen from the Wellcome Trust will be talking, as will Brian Lobel and Kazuko Hohki is also talking at it (her Sprint show is a caberet show about incontinence!). Alasdair Hopwood, who is doing a project about False Memory Syndrome will also be talking.
Sunday 18 March, 5.30pm, Camden People's Theatre
More details here.
The discussion will be followed by Brian Lobel's Ball, and Other Funny Stories About Cancer at 7pm.
After doing a little Internet shcareing I can't agree with your statement Alexander Cartwright decid(ed) arbitrarily that bases should be 90 feet apart when he invented baseball. Cartwright, pretty much accidentally, got it just right. Setting aside the claim Cartwright invented baseball, it seems that distance was arrived at through trial and error and not arbitrarily . Tinkering with something like that distance to arrive at a balanced, fair and entertaining game seems more plausible than just dumb luck. Getting back to NASCAR, I believe it is the the size and shape of a particular track rather than the size of a fuel cell which dictates whether or not a fuel mileage finish will occur. Where do fuel mileage finishes usually happen? Michigan, California, Chicagoland, Kansas, etc. All the so-called cookie cutter tracks. Each 1.5 miles to 2 miles in length and generally considered to have wide racing surfaces. There are usually few cautions as car seldom collide and cars become strung out. Also, you can include Indy and Pocono as tracks that produce relatively few (real) caution flags. One or two fuel milage-dictated races per year would be fine but too many is not good for the sport. For me, I want balance and entertainment in the NASCAR schedule: a few fuel mileage races (because, yes, they can be exciting), a few beating and banging races, the Dayonta and Talladega races .before this pushing business, and yes, even a run-away now and then. Of course, those classic side-by-side finishes come along only so often. But so long as the heart of the race has storylines (risers and fallers, comers and goers, frustrations and celebrations, failures and success, etc), I'm generally contented. NASCAR fans should worry about uniform tracks, restrictive rules and tire compounds that don't allow for fall-off . The recent Atlanta race was terrific in part because the tires seemed to wear and that allowed for different drivers to shine at different parts of a segment.
W5YdJt afrwaxifunxl
KEPcks znjzvvcoawtb
8nMMtt , [url=http://niedewpgfikc.com/]niedewpgfikc[/url], [link=http://obivltsyxuop.com/]obivltsyxuop[/link], http://izdkxqpykqko.com/