Acting Like Children

Posted: 26/04/11

David Harradine, Artistic Director of Fevered Sleep, spoke at Rose Bruford College on 16 April as part of the Acting Like Children project organised by Polka Theatre, Travelling Light and Action Transport Theatre.

David spoke about his experiences while making Brilliant and On Ageing and the idea of identification and truthfulness. Here is a snippit of his speech. To read the full presentation go to, where you can also sign up to become a member.

"As adult theatre goers, we also choose to watch things which show us radically different ways of living and being, theatre is also valuable because it allows us to access experiences and identities that are profoundly different from our own.  At the risk of being provocative, I wonder then why it is that so much theatre for children focuses on children:  on child characters. 
Is it a legacy of the influence of children’s literature on the children’s theatre landscape:  the dozens and dozens and dozens of adaptations of children’s books in which children take on a central role?  Or is it because we think that children can only identify with or understand the experiences of other children, that they cannot show interest in or engagement with an adult’s experiences?  And if this is the case, do we project this assumption onto children because too many adults fail to show interest in or engagement with the experiences of a child?
I suppose, at the risk of being provocative, I wonder why it is that whereas as adult theatre watchers we seek out and value theatre that shows us people and lives and situations that are beyond our own experience, as adult theatre makers we feel that children want or need to watch theatre which shows them representations of children on stage."


  1. Sat Jun 4th 2011 / 2:57am / Suzy
    IJWTS wow! Why can't I think of tihngs like that?
  2. Fri Nov 11th 2011 / 9:03am / P Hardy
    I hear you but surely we as adult theatre-goers see other adults on stage albeit 'beyond our own experience' which engages, thrills and challenges us; and therefore children should be afforded similar opportunites? How fascinating to engage with the life of another child in a culture/life/country removed from one's own! I agree children's theatre productions should not, by design focus, on child characters but there are many memorable moments in my experience of child characters in theatre.
  3. Thu Sep 6th 2012 / 17:53pm / Dorian
    I'm looking to buy a car here and was doing the reaersch. The Cost to Own of Hybrids was consistently more than similar (or same) model non-Hybrids. The only advantages Hybrids have is with the fuel costs over the life of the car, and the Hybrid tax credit. But, they're at a disadvantage with almost everything else. And, they're killed by the depreciation, due it seems to the high invoice price. (O.K. I think I just unintentionally made a really good argument for buying Hybrids Used.)But, just to compare the two cars I'm liking, the Honda Civic super-basic trim has a CtO of $24,200 and the Honda Civic Hybrid $26,900. And, the Civic Hybrid is actually way more affordable and closer to the CtO of its non-Hybrid sister model than the other Hybrids I've been looking at.Here's what I'm thinking. The projected Cost to Own is based on a few guesses, like how much mileage you're likely to have, and the price of gas pretty much staying where it is.Now I don't want to read doomsday predictions about how we're going to go all Mad Max. I don't. But, it's natural to suppose the trend of gas prices going up is going to continue.I mean the reason it happened in the first place is because people in developing countries have been buying cars, so the demand for gas has gone up. These countries aren't done developing. Or, to put it another way, there's alot of people in the world who haven't bought a car yet.Back to the Civic I figure with the differences in CtOs not including the cost of gas ($4,300), the cost of gas would pretty much have to double ($4,300/($8,600-$6,200)=~1.8). And, that's pretty much just for the Honda Civic. I'm having a real hard time imagining a horrible nightmare scenario where the Ford Fusion Hybrid New would be a better buy than the Ford Fusion New.I guess I've pretty much already answered my own question. But, I have another scenario for all of you. If someone starts mass producing Hydrogen Fuel Cell cars for mass sales, what's that going to do to the price of gas? I'd expect it to go down partly because the demand for gas would be stemmed somewhat, but mostly just because the gas companies would want to incentivise their consumers keeping combustion cars.I guess the big question there is, how likely is that to happen in the next 5 years? Or however long? Isn't it odd how these alternative cars have the potential to sabotage each other?And, how competitive is hydrogen with gas as a fuel? Obviously, there's the old issue that hydrogen would have to build their distribution from the ground up. But, once that's done, how much would a mile fueled by gas cost vs. a mile fueled by hydrogen?Gas comes out of the ground with it's energy already in it. Petroleum pumps try to be (and are) highly energy efficient. But, pumping a liquid out of minerals Well, isn't that like squeezing blood from a stone?Hydrogen you have to use up energy to electrolyze it or refine it from fossil fuels. I'm not bothered so much by the greenhouse implications. From an engineering standpoint it's an energy storage device. What's the cost? Electricity is cheap. Right?Then there's the comparative fuel economies of fuel cell and combustion cars. Hydrogen is more energy intensive than gas. A full tank is lighter. The lightening of the cars load would give it a slight advantage in fuel economy. Wouldn't it? (Get the image of hydrogen making balloon floaty cars out of your head please. It so doesn't work that way.) Also, since the internal drag is on a much shorter drive train, wouldn't that give Hydrogen Fuel Cell cars a tremendous advantage in fuel economy?So an swers, are you saying that if I asked these other questions separately you WOULD answer them? Besides I'm dubious of that on it's own, it kind of sounds like Y!A points farming to me, at a cost to me!Beyond that it's occurred to me you don't have to double the price of gas. For vocations that involve alot of driving you could easily more than double the mileage and the fuel consumption. Like I imagine Taxi companies, if they're not using Hybrids are pretty much losing money.From the National Hydrogen Association: The estimated costs for producing and delivering hydrogen to thefueling station using today’s technologies vary from $2.10/gallon of gasoline equivalent (gge) to $9.10/gge. These hydrogen costs do not include highway taxes and do include the increased fuel efficiency of fuel cell vehicles compared to gasoline-powered hybrid electric vehicles. So best case scenario hydrogen is just competitive with gas.An swers, sorry you did write that mileage can make a Hybrid worthwhile first. But, I still don't like the other thing you wrote, if only because that means flooding the latest question pages with spam questions. There's enough inane crap on here as it is.On the other side of things, saying hydrogen as a fuel isn't going to happen in a big way tomorrow is not the same as saying it's never going to happen. The price of gas will go up, not least of all because people consider it to be an essential consumable. People don't just use less simply because demand outstrips supply, so the price has to go way up to be prohibitive. Next we'd need to see a big drop in the price of electricity. Maybe when they mine the moon for tritium for fusion power, though the new fusion powerplants and the power infrastructure will still cost money on top of the price tag of a commercial lunar space program. I think the big energy conglomerates like GE can afford to do it easy. But I've never been a big fan of electric cars. I don't think the oil companies are trying to keep them buried because they threaten their monopoly. I just don't think they've ever really been any good. Granted tremendous advances in battery technology have given them a huge step forward. But, even with that and regenerative braking (an old technology which has gained new interest) electric cars' ranges just aren't very good. I know that sound like a strawman attack, like the old one that electric cars can't make it up hills. But, it's true. At the least, going on a roadtrip in an electric car is out of the question. It doesn't help there the batteries are pretty dang heavy. But again the weight is less important than internal drag on the drive train, as well as regenerative braking. (Batteries are also expensive, but not more so than engine blocks and full drive trains, and definitely not more than hydrogen tanks and fuel cells.)
  4. Fri Sep 7th 2012 / 4:23am / afcyds
    nnnMVa cxmdirgieonf
  5. Sat Sep 8th 2012 / 2:39am / idttcspt
    LxoShm , [url=]gokicikkvinj[/url], [link=]ilreudlxqvdv[/link],
  6. Sat Sep 8th 2012 / 12:59pm / qczhnvry
    GK8Hts hjawztrhobwh
  7. Sun Sep 7th 2014 / 1:40am / ThomasFep
    florida mental health jobs acheter levitra generique atorvastatin 10 mg tablet
  8. Sat Jan 21st 2017 / 17:23pm / DorothyDiora
    wh0cd465409 doxycycline mono toradol allopurinol drug buy robaxin online canadian abilify levitra 20 mg buy viagra pills online medrol benicar
  9. Wed Mar 1st 2017 / 19:49pm / DorothyDiora
    wh0cd465409 generic cialis


CAPTCHA Image Refresh